Page 59 - Profile's Unit Trusts & Collective Investments - March 2026
P. 59

Costs and pricing                                                     Chapter 3


          Cost layers
          TER figures include cost layers below the reporting fund. A fund of funds (FoF), in other
          words, reflects its own costs in its TER plus those of the underlying investments (proportional
          to the holdings in each underlying asset). If a FoF with an annual fee of 1.5%, for example,
          holds underlying investments that also have annual fees of 1.5%, the annual fee component of the
          TER will be 3% rather than 1.5%.
         service fee of 1.5% and a performance fee of 1.2%, we know that 0.8% of portfolio value (on average)
         was expended in operating costs.
         Technical details
           Technically, the TER is the total of expenses and fees expressed as a percentage of the daily
         average value of the portfolio calculated over a period of usually a financial year. Taxes (like VAT and
         stamp duty) are included in the TER.
           According to the ASISA standard, both the TER and the TC must be calculated over three-year
         rolling periods to coincide with quarter-ends. Quarterly fact sheets, in other words, must reflect the
         average annual expenses over the last 36 months. Where there is insufficient data (eg, the fund is
         less than three years old), the manager must annualise the available data – except for funds younger
         than one year, where the manager must make estimates grounded on fair principles.
           TERs are reported by unit class, but operating costs are nearly always charged to the portfolio as
         a whole. Managers are therefore required to apportion the operating costs by unit class based on the
         proportion of the fund held in each unit class. The annual service fees (and actual performance fees
         charged, where applicable) for each unit class are then added to the apportioned operating costs for
         each class to establish the total costs for each class.
           Multi-tier funds (such as fund of funds) must also report TERs, but they can obviously only do
         this once the TERs of the underlying funds are available. Fund of funds are therefore given an extra
         month to do the calculation. Fund managers are also required to advise investors if they become
         aware of some event or situation which is likely to cause the TER (excluding performance fees)
         to change materially.
         Other cost indicators
           While TERs have improved transparency around costs in the unit trust industry, the FSCA has
         pushed  for  an  even  more  inclusive  total  cost  of  ownership  (TCO)  measure  that  can  be  applied
         across a range of product types. The effective annual cost (EAC) measure, announced by ASISA in
         2016, goes some way to answering the FSCA’s call.
           A TCO calculation seeks to quantify all the costs associated with a product, including the costs
         of acquisition (such as initial charges, which are excluded from TERs), the ongoing costs, and exit
         charges (such as early termination penalties for defined period products) where applicable.
         Effective annual cost measure
           ASISA announced in 2016 the introduction of a new method of disclosing the costs of financial
         products,  the  EAC.  Since  June  2017  EAC  has  been  in  force  for  all  products  launched  after
         1  April  2010,  and  it  now  applies  (since  June  2018)  to  all  products  launched  after  1  April  2000.
         Older products had to be EAC compliant by 1 June 2019. Note that at this stage the EAC is not an
         MDD requirement.
           The EAC, which does not replace any existing standards, applies to all financial products with
         an  investment  component  offered  by  ASISA  members,  not  just  collective  investment  schemes.
         EACs allow investors to compare different types of products and different channels, including unit
         trusts,  endowment  policies,  wrapper  funds,  retirement  annuities  (RAs),  preservation  funds  and
         living annuities (LAs).
           The reason for another cost measure is that the TER does not allow for all the expenses associated
         with fixed term products. Unlike the TER, the EAC makes it possible to compare costs over defined
         periods, which is important for charges like initial fees which need to be amortised over the life spans
         of product options to achieve fairly comparable results.


                        Profile’s Unit Trusts & Collective Investments March 2026      57
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64