Page 152 - Profile's Unit Trusts & Collective Investments - March 2026
P. 152

Chapter 8                                                 Classification of CISs

           One  of  the  possible  disadvantages  of  using  a  feeder  fund  to  get  offshore  exposure  is  that
         capital gains tax (CGT) might be higher. This is because of the way CGT is calculated for offshore
         investments. With a feeder fund, CGT is paid on the gain in rands (ie, effectively including currency
         gains). With an offshore investment, however, CGT is paid on the foreign currency gain translated
         into rands at the time of sale. Given the tendency of the rand to weaken against major currencies
         over the long term, this can mean a substantial CGT difference. For example, an investment of
         USD1 000 at R14/USD redeemed two years later with a 20% capital gain with the exchange rate
         having risen to R18/USD would mean, at the maximum marginal tax rate for individuals, R1 368 in
         CGT via the feeder fund, but only R648 in CGT via an offshore investment (ie, money transferred
         overseas). Note that this would turn into a disadvantage if the rand strengthened over the investment
         period.

         Multi Manager funds
           The Multi Manager fund is another fund “concept” which transcends the ASISA sectors. Multi
         management is about the way in which a fund is managed rather than the type of assets in which it
         invests (the latter being the basis of the ASISA classification).
           In the early days of unit trusts each fund had its own fund manager. This “single fund manager”
         concept is still the most common management structure today.
           Obviously  the  single  fund  manager  does  not  work  in  isolation,  but  has  a  support  team  at  the
         management  company,  which  may  include  fundamental,  technical  and  quantitative  analysts.
         Some management companies use a team approach to manage their funds. In this case no single
         fund manager is entirely responsible for one fund. Instead, decisions about asset allocation are
         made  by  an  investment  committee.  Either  way,  both  individual  fund  managers  and  investment
         committees tend to have a particular investment “style”.
           The multi manager concept grows out of the belief that the investment styles of particular managers
         or investment committees are not equally effective under all market conditions. The particular style
         of one investment house may produce relatively good performances in a bear market, while the style
         of another may produce above average returns in a bull market. Or one style may excel when bond
         markets are running, and another when offshore markets are doing well.
           The  Multi  Manager  fund  tries  to  capitalise  on  these  different  strengths  by  outsourcing  the
         management of the fund to two or more complementary managers or investment houses.
           Multi Managed funds typically have a greater level of diversification compared to single manager
         funds and therefore lower active risk (ie, non-market risk) than single manager funds.
           There are two main types of Multi Manager funds: Fund of Funds and “manager of managers”
         type funds. Note that not all Fund of Funds are explicitly Multi Manager funds in the true sense: to
         qualify as a Multi Managed fund the manager must be choosing underlying funds specifically on
         fund manager and style criteria rather than asset allocation criteria.
         Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs)
           Exchanged Traded Funds (ETFs) are funds which are listed on a stock exchange and can be
         traded like a share.
           Initially ETFs were tracker or index funds offered at low cost.
           Recently,  however,  actively  managed  ETFs  have  been  launched  that  are  managed  by  fund
         managers with the expertise to pick securities.
           The majority (but not all) ETFs listed on the JSE are also registered as collective investment
         schemes, in effect creating two markets for these funds.
           SA’s first ETF, the Satrix 40, was launched in November 2000. It tracks the FTSE/JSETop 40
         index. Since the launch of the Satrix 40 the JSE’s index-tracking ETF sector has grown to 131 funds
         by February 2026, including sector-specific ETFs, funds that track overseas and global indices,
         and even a fund that tracks the rand. The Actively Managed ETF sector had grown to 30 funds by
         January 2026.




      150                 Profile’s Unit Trusts & Collective Investments March 2026
   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157