Page 82 - Profile's Unit Trusts & Collective Investments - September 2025
P. 82

Chapter 4                                                      The CIS industry

         that the nature of the relationship between an intermediary and one or more product supplier must be
         clear – customers have a right to know if any limitations or restrictions imposed on the broker affect
         the advice given and the products offered. To this end the FSCA has proposed new terminology that
         better reflects the relationships between advisers and product suppliers (see box on page 79).
           The first draft of the RDR proposals in 2014 implied that commission-based models of remuneration
         for brokers were under threat, but the latest RDR updates suggest that broker commissions are here
         to stay, particularly on low-cost products that require higher remuneration for advisers and where
         advice fees are unpopular with consumers.
           The  position  of  brokers  in  the  industry  changed  dramatically  in  1997  when  a  landmark  court
         decision was made in favour of the investor in the now famous Durr vs Absa Bank case. The particular
         broker and his employer, Absa, were held liable in delict for the damages suffered by an investor who
         was negligently advised to invest in supreme debentures and preference shares in 1989.
                                                     The Durr vs Absa Bank case put the onus
                                                   on the financial adviser to justify why a product
                                                   –  especially  where  there  is  an  additional
                                                   personal  incentive  for  the  adviser  –  should
                                                   be used. Under the FSCA’s RDR proposals,
                                                   an investment process that is compliant with
                                                   the  regulatory  framework  grows  ever  more
                                                   demanding – this is a major factor in the rise of
                                                   DFMs and the sharp decline in the number of
                                                   truly independent financial advisers operating
                                                   in the local market.
                                                     The  FAIS  Act  which  became  effective  in
                                                   2004 introduced the General Code of Conduct
                                                   for  financial  advisers.  The  code  obliges
                                                   advisers  to  ensure  products  recommended
         for consumers are suitable for them and that they understand what they are buying or investing in.
         The qualification and licensing requirements for all financial intermediaries introduced in 2004 in
         terms of the FAIS Fit and Proper Determination (amended and updated in December 2017) has
         improved the service offered to investors by brokers and advisers.

































       80                Profile’s Unit Trusts & Collective Investments September 2025
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87