Page 80 - Profile's Unit Trusts & Collective Investments - September 2025
P. 80

Chapter 4                                                      The CIS industry


                   What is a LISP?
                   A linked investment service provider (LISP), also known as an investment platform, is a financial
                   institution which packages, distributes and administers a broad range of unit trust-based
                   investments spanning voluntary to retirement planning products. Any investment made
          through these platforms provides a client a single entry into a selection of investments which can,
          with the help of a financial adviser, be used to create a suitable portfolio. Note that LISPA (the industry
          association for LISPs) merged with the ACI, the LOA and IMASA to form ASISA in 2008.
          behalf of clients in units in a collective investment scheme on the basis that such units are purchased
         and held in bulk or repurchased in bulk”.
           LISPs  have  been  described  as  “unit  trust  warehouses”  or  “fund  supermarkets”.  They  play  a
         significant role in the industry, and have at times been responsible for up to half of all inflows into unit
         trusts and over a third of all assets under management.
           A LISP can be registered as a discretionary or non-discretionary service provider. A discretionary
         service  provider  makes  and  implements  investment  decisions  on  behalf  of  clients,  whereas  a
         non-discretionary  service  provider  provides  facilities  for  buying,  managing  and  switching
         investments but does not get involved in decision making.
           Most of the bigger, more successful linked product companies are associated with banks or life
         insurance companies and use the bank’s client base to sell their products. LISPs offer two main
         advantages to investors. The first is the ability to buy units across a wide range of management
         companies through one service provider. The second is the ability to switch cheaply from one fund
         to another across the industry (ie, not just within one management company).
           LISPs have been largely responsible for the narrowing of the gap between wholesale products and
         retail products. In the late 1990s, retail investors paid initial charges of 5% while wholesale rates (to
         institutional clients) were a fraction of a percent. By negotiating wholesale rates and passing these
         on to the retail market, LISPs changed investors’ perceptions of what they should pay in charges.
         Competition amongst LISPs has been an important factor in a broad industry to move away from
         initial fees. LISP online platforms have also contributed to downward pressure on annual fees.
           If this is a positive influence of the LISP movement, one negative has been the increased churning
         in the industry. The term “churning” derives from the 1980’s bull run when certain US brokerage firms
         were guilty of buying and selling shares aggressively for clients, mainly to earn brokerage fees, and
         with little concern for investment performance. Switching on the Momentum investment platform or
         LISP in 2021 resulted in an annualised behaviour tax of 3.5% for investors amounting to more than
         R90m, the company has reported.
           Churning appears to have been less of a problem in recent years, although some commentators
         are  still  concerned  that  unit  trust  portfolios  in  the  hands  of  investors  are  generally  adjusted  too
         frequently.
         Retirement products
           LISPs have also largely been responsible for enabling the development of retirement funds and
         living annuities that offer members or annuitants a choice of underlying unit trust investments.
           For individuals, most LISPs offer retirement annuities (RAs), investment-linked living annuities
         (ILLAs)  or  preservation  funds  with  a  choice  of  underlying  unit  trusts.  In  the  case  of  RAs  and
         preservation funds, the unit trusts need to be those that comply with Regulation 28 or the choice
         of funds in the product must comply with Regulation 28. The only exceptions are for older RAs or
         preservation funds that were established before and have not been amended since complaince with
         Regulation 28 on an individual, rather than fund level, became a requirement in 2011.
           The  growth  of  umbrella  retirement  funds  –  offering  employers  the  option  to  participate  in
         professionally  managed  and  cost-efficient  funds  established  typically  by  financial  institutions  –
         has also resulted in growth in the number of retirement fund members who are offered a choice of
         underlying unit trust investments for their retirement savings.




       78                Profile’s Unit Trusts & Collective Investments September 2025
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85