Page 29 - Profile's Unit Trusts & Collective Investments - September 2025
P. 29

History of collective investment schemes                              Chapter 1



          Dividend/Dividend Yield
          The dividend is the amount paid per share to shareholders (usually every six months for
          listed  companies)  from  the  company’s  after-tax  profits.  Companies  generally  only  pay
          dividends  when  they  are  doing  well.  Unit  trusts  invested  in  shares  derive  part  of  their
          income from dividends paid to the trust by the companies in which they are invested. They pass this on
          to unitholders as part of the unit trust distribution (sometimes also referred to as a dividend, although
          “distribution” is more accurate as the payment also includes some interest). Dividends were tax free
          from 1990 to 2011, but in March 2012 a dividends withholding tax (DWT) at a flat rate of 15% was
          introduced. The introduction of DWT coincided with the abolishment of the 10% Secondary Tax on
          Companies (STC), itself a form of dividend tax, so the impact on dividend investors was less onerous
          than it appeared. DWT was increased to 20% in February 2017.
          The dividend yield is a percentage which indicates the dividend payout as a percentage of the share
          price or unit price. It is calculated as dividends paid over the past 12 months expressed as a percentage
          of the latest price. If the price rises between dividend payouts, the dividend yield falls (because the
          numerator – the dividend – is fixed for some months, but the denominator – the price – is rising). Since
          the introduction of DWT in 2012, the published yields for shares and unit trusts usually (but not always)
          reflect gross dividend yields/distribution yields before tax.
           The  comparatively  rapid  addition  of  funds  in  the  1980s,  however,  paled  into  insignificance
         compared  to  growth  in  the  1990s.  By  the  end  of  1999  there  were  271  rand-denominated  unit
         trusts (including 11 Namibian funds). The market value of assets under management had risen
         to R112.8bn.
           The huge changes in the industry over time are not only reflected in the number of funds available
         and the magnitude of assets under management. The range and type of funds available has also
         evolved dramatically in response to changing market conditions and investor needs.
           A comparison of collective investment schemes available in the 1970s and the 1990s highlights
         some of the massive changes in the industry.
           Of the 12 funds available up to the end of 1979, all but one were equity funds. (The exception
         was the Standard Bank Extra Income Fund which, as the name suggests, focussed on income
         generation rather than capital growth through equity investment.)
           By contrast, the range of collective investments available in the 1990s included money market
         funds, gilt funds, many specialist equity funds (which focussed on particular sectors), international
         funds (which invested in offshore assets), funds of funds, and wrap funds. Not all of these fell under
         the Unit Trusts Control Act. Wrap funds, for example, effectively fell under the ambit of the Stock
         Exchanges Control Act.
           Other forms of collective investments had appeared, such as investment trusts, which were JSE
         listed companies that had similar objectives to unit trusts, but whose prices were determined by
         supply and demand. Property unit trusts, also a form of collective investment, were governed by
         special rules in the Unit Trusts Control Act. Like investment trusts, they were close-ended and listed
         on the JSE.
           The two main factors that led to this explosion of funds were increased consumer sophistication
         and an inevitable product differentiation on the part of management companies.
           Increased consumer sophistication led to a demand for more specialist funds. Some investors
         were  happy  with  the  general  equity  fund,  but  others,  while  still  interested  in  professional  asset
         management and the other benefits of unit trusts, wanted to choose a narrow asset allocation range
         (such  as  technology  stocks,  or  resources  stocks,  or  interest-bearing  securities).  Management
         companies responded by creating unit trusts with narrower mandates that restricted asset managers
         to investing in particular types of assets.
           Management  companies  had  further  incentives  for  product  differentiation.  Regardless  of  fund
         manager skills, broad-based equity funds tended to rise and fall with the JSE Overall index (as it was




                      Profile’s Unit Trusts & Collective Investments September 2025    27
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34