Page 158 - Profile's Unit Trusts & Collective Investments - September 2025
P. 158

Chapter 8                                                 Classification of CISs

           More than 10 collective investments in SA track smart indices. The underlying indices include
         the Rafi, the SWIX and the DIVI (see box on previous page).

         Feeder funds
           A feeder fund is one of several types of conduit funds that act as channels for investments into
         larger funds.
           The principal (or receiving fund) is sometimes called an umbrella fund or “master” fund.
           This tiered structure is also sometimes used by hedge funds to create critical mass by pooling
         investment capital from different sources.
           Returns from the master fund, such as dividends and capital gains, are distributed to the feeder
         funds on a pro-rata basis.
           In  the  South  African  environment,  some  feeder  funds  have  a  one-to-one  relationship  with
         the master fund. In these cases the feeder fund is created in order to have a rand-denominated
         investment vehicle in SA while the underlying assets are held overseas and priced in their respective
         base currencies.
           Feeder  funds  for  retail  hedge  funds  were  not  possible  until  February  2024  when  the  FSCA
         amended an its earlier Board Notice 52 of 2015 that prohibited Retail Hedge funds from investing
         more than 75% of the fund in a single portfolio.
           For South Africans, feeder funds are often the easiest and most cost-effective way to get offshore
         exposure  –  the  investor  can  make  a  local  investment,  denominated  in  rands,  without  having  to
         transfer money overseas or apply for a tax clearance. The costs associated with feeder funds are
         often lower than those of offshore investments, especially where currency conversion charges are
         taken into account.
           One  of  the  possible  disadvantages  of  using  a  feeder  fund  to  get  offshore  exposure  is  that
         capital gains tax (CGT) might be higher. This is because of the way CGT is calculated for offshore
         investments. With a feeder fund, CGT is paid on the gain in rands (ie, effectively including currency
         gains). With an offshore investment, however, CGT is paid on the foreign currency gain translated
         into rands at the time of sale. Given the tendency of the rand to weaken against major currencies
         over the long term, this can mean a substantial CGT difference. For example, an investment of USD1
         000 at R14/USD redeemed two years later with a 20% capital gain with the exchange rate having
         risen to R18/USD would mean, at the maximum marginal tax rate for individuals, R1 368 in CGT via
         the feeder fund, but only R648 in CGT via an offshore investment (ie, money transferred overseas).
         Note that this would turn into a disadvantage if the rand strengthened over the investment period.
         Multi Manager funds
           The Multi Manager fund is another fund “concept” which transcends the ASISA sectors. Multi
         management is about the way in which a fund is managed rather than the type of assets in which it
         invests (the latter being the basis of the ASISA classification).
           In the early days of unit trusts each fund had its own fund manager. This “single fund manager”
         concept is still the most common management structure today.
           Obviously  the  single  fund  manager  does  not  work  in  isolation,  but  has  a  support  team  at  the
         management  company,  which  may  include  fundamental,  technical  and  quantitative  analysts.
         Some management companies use a team approach to manage their funds. In this case no single
         fund manager is entirely responsible for one fund. Instead, decisions about asset allocation are
         made  by  an  investment  committee.  Either  way,  both  individual  fund  managers  and  investment
         committees tend to have a particular investment “style”.
           The multi manager concept grows out of the belief that the investment styles of particular managers
         or investment committees are not equally effective under all market conditions. The particular style
         of one investment house may produce relatively good performances in a bear market, while the style
         of another may produce above average returns in a bull market. Or one style may excel when bond
         markets are running, and another when offshore markets are doing well.




      156                Profile’s Unit Trusts & Collective Investments September 2025
   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163