Page 82 - Profile's Unit Trusts & Collective Investments - March 2025
P. 82

CHAPTER 4

         means that the nature of the relationship between an
         intermediary and one or more product suppliers must be
         clear – customers have a right to know if any limitations
         or restrictions imposed on the broker affect the advice
         given and the products offered. To this end the FSCA has
         proposed new terminology that better reflects the
         relationships between advisers and product suppliers
         (see box on page 79).
            The first draft of the RDR proposals in 2014 implied
         that commission-based models of remuneration for brokers
         were under threat, but the latest RDR updates suggest that
         broker commissions are here to stay, particularly on
         low-cost products that require higher remuneration for
         advisers and where advice fees are unpopular with
         consumers.
            The position of brokers in the industry changed dramatically in 1997 when a landmark court
         decision was made in favour of the investor in the now famous Durr vs Absa Bank case. The particular
         broker and his employer, Absa, were held liable in delict for the damages suffered by an investor who
         was negligently advised to invest in Supreme debentures and preference shares in 1989.
            The Durr vs Absa case put the onus on the financial adviser to justify why a product – especially
         where there is an additional personal incentive for the adviser – should be used. Under the FSCA’s
         RDR proposals, an investment process that is compliant with the regulatory framework grows ever
         more demanding – this is a major factor in the rise of discretionary fund managers (DFMs) and the
         sharp decline in the number of truly independent financial advisers operating in the local market.
            The Financial advisery and Intermediary Services (FAIS) Act which became effective in 2004
         introduced the General Code of Conduct for financial advisers. The code obliges advisers to ensure
         products recommended for consumers are suitable for them and that they understand what they
         are buying or investing in. The qualification and licensing requirements for all financial
         intermediaries introduced in 2004 in terms of the FAIS Fit and Proper Determination (amended
         and updated in December 2017) has improved the service offered to investors by brokers and
         advisers.

































         80                      Profile’s Unit Trusts & Collective Investments — Understanding Unit Trusts
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87