Page 80 - Profile's Unit Trusts & Collective Investments - March 2025
P. 80

CHAPTER 4



          What is a LISP?
          A Linked Investment Service Provider, also known as an investment platform, is a financial institution
          which packages, distributes and administers a broad range of unit trust-based investments spanning
          voluntary to retirement planning products. Any investment made through these platforms provides a
          client a single entry into a selection of investments which can, with the help of a financial adviser, be used to create
          a suitable portfolio. Note that LISPA (the industry association for LISPs) merged with the ACI, the LOA and IMASA
          to form ASISA in 2008.

         Linked Investment Service Providers (LISPs)

            The FSCA defines a LISP as a service provider whose business consists wholly or partly of
         “implementing and or capturing investment instructions received from investment managers on
         behalf of clients in units in a collective investment scheme on the basis that such units are
         purchased and held in bulk or repurchased in bulk”.
            LISPs have been described as “unit trust warehouses” or “fund supermarkets”. They play a
         significant role in the industry, and have at times been responsible for up to half of all inflows into
         unit trusts and over a third of all assets under management.
            A LISP can be registered as a discretionary or non-discretionary service provider.
         A discretionary service provider makes and implements investment decisions on behalf of clients,
         whereas a non-discretionary service provider provides facilities for buying, managing and
         switching investments but does not get involved in decision making.
            Most of the bigger, more successful linked product companies are associated with banks or life
         insurance companies and use the bank’s client base to sell their products. LISPs offer two main
         advantages to investors. The first is the ability to buy units across a wide range of management
         companies through one service provider. The second is the ability to switch cheaply from one fund
         to another across the industry (ie, not just within one management company).
            LISPs have been largely responsible for the narrowing of the gap between wholesale products and
         retail products. In the late 1990s, retail investors paid initial charges of 5% while wholesale rates (to
         institutional clients) were a fraction of a percent. By negotiating wholesale rates and passing these on
         to the retail market, LISPs changed investors’ perceptions of what they should pay in charges.
         Competition amongst LISPs has been an important factor in a broad industry move away from initial
         fees. LISP online platforms have also contributed to downward pressure on annual fees.
            If this is a positive influence of the LISP movement, one negative has been the increased
         churning in the industry. The term “churning” derives from the 1980’s bull run when certain US
         brokerage firms were guilty of buying and selling shares aggressively for clients, mainly to earn
         brokerage fees, and with little concern for investment performance. Switching on the Momentum
         investment platform or LISP in 2021 resulted in an annualised behaviour tax of 3.5% for investors
         amounting to more than R90 million, the company has reported.
            Churning appears to have been less of a problem in recent years, although some commentators are
         still concerned that unit trust portfolios in the hands of investors are generally adjusted too frequently.
         Retirement Products
            LISPs have also largely been responsible for enabling the development of retirement funds and
         living annuities that offer members or annuitants a choice of underlying unit trust investments.
            For individuals, most LISPs offer retirement annuities (RAs), investment-linked living annuities
         (Illas) or preservation funds with a choice of underlying unit trusts. In the case of RAs and
         preservation funds, the unit trusts need to be those that comply with Regulation 28 or the choice of
         funds in the product must comply with Regulation 28. The only exceptions are for older RAs or
         preservation funds that were established before and have not been amended since complaince with
         regulation 28 on an individual, rather than fund level, became a requirement in 2011.
            The growth of umbrella retirement funds - offering employers the option to participate in
         professionally managed and cost-efficient funds established typically by financial institutions - has


         78                      Profile’s Unit Trusts & Collective Investments — Understanding Unit Trusts
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85