Page 91 - Profile's Unit Trusts & Collective Investments - March 2026
P. 91

Legislation and guidelines                                            Chapter 5

         their agents. The TCF principles represent the best way to build a relationship of trust with clients and
         to achieve a sustainable long-term business model. A key feature of TCF is a top-down approach
         which tasks business leaders and senior managers with creating a culture of good service rather
         than a delegated “tick box” compliance approach.
           TCF goes beyond customer satisfaction. The fact that customers are satisfied does not necessarily
         mean they have been treated fairly – satisfaction might be due to ignorance, distorted expectations,
         or even misleading information given by the service provider.
           In applying TCF, companies should seek to achieve six key outcomes, which are encapsulated
         in the mindset: doing things right and doing the right thing. The key objectives can be summarised
         as follows:
           R   In  December  2014  the  National  Treasury  issued  an  updated  discussion  document  titled
              Treating  Customers  Fairly  in  the  Financial  Sector:  a  market  conduct  policy  framework  for
              South Africa. The FSCA’s TCF initiative is part of the regulatory initiative spearheaded by the
              FSR Act. The TCF principles underpin the FSCA’s General Code of Conduct (GCOC) and are
              one of the building blocks of the draft COFI Bill.
           R   At  a  practical  level,  the  TCF  principles  are  being  incorporated  into  the  new  regulatory
              structures evolving under the FSR Act and the COFI  Act – TCF will not exist as a separate
              piece  of  legislation.  In  the  words  of  Caroline  Da  Silva,  the  former  head  of  the  FSCA,
              the  TCF  objectives  are  “the  guiding  principles  that  the  FSCA  will  use  to  design  both  our
              regulatory as well as supervisory frameworks to ensure that financial institutions will indeed
              prioritise these outcomes”.
         FAIS Ombud
           The FAIS Act set up the Ombud for Financial Service Providers or FAIS Ombud, charged with
         adjudicating complaints. Once the COFI Bill is enacted, the Ombud’s office enabling legislation will
         be moved to the FSR Act and the Ombud Council created by that Act. Currently, in terms of the
         FAIS Act, the objective of the Ombud is to “consider and dispose of complaints in a procedurally
         fair, informal, economical and expeditious manner”. The office of the Ombud provides a dispute
         resolution  mechanism  which  avoids  lengthy  and  costly  court  proceedings.  In  considering
         complaints, the Ombud must consider the contractual arrangements and legal relationship between
         the parties, and must act in a fair, impartial and independent manner.
           A determination made by the Ombud (or a final decision by a board of appeal) is regarded as a civil
         judgement of court.
           The Ombud has fairly broad powers in terms of the FAIS Act and the Ombud Council’s Rules for
         the Ombud for Financial Services Providers.
           The Rules, which came into effect on 1 July 2024, replace the offices Rules on Proceedings,
         which had been in place since 2004. He may elect to refer a matter to court if he feels that there are
         reasonable grounds why the office of the Ombud should not deal with the matter. Most disputes
         between consumers and FSPs or FSPRs, however, will be considered by the Ombud. Note that the
         Ombud may not consider a matter which has already been taken to court.
           Before beginning an official investigation into a complaint, the Ombud must in writing inform every
         other interested party about the complaint, and must give all parties an opportunity to submit a
         response to the complaint.
           The Ombud must, as a first resort, “explore any reasonable prospect of resolving a complaint by a
         conciliated settlement acceptable to all parties”. The Ombud may suggest mediation to the parties,
         and may allow legal representation if he feels this is appropriate.
           Where possible, the Ombud will suggest a solution to the parties. The parties must advise the
         Ombud whether his recommendation is acceptable, and must give reasons if it is not acceptable.
         Where the parties accept the Ombud’s recommendations, it has the force of a court order.
           If  the  Ombud  is  unable  to  achieve  some  conciliation  between  the  parties,  the  Ombud
         must  make  a  final  determination.  This  could  involve  dismissing  the  complaint,  upholding  the
         complaint,  or  partially  upholding  the  complaint.  In  the  latter  cases,  the  Ombud  may  make  a



                        Profile’s Unit Trusts & Collective Investments March 2026      89
   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96