Page 100 - Profile's Unit Trusts & Collective Investments - March 2026
P. 100

Chapter 6                                                       Investment risk


                   Risk profiles and risk ratings
                   Both funds and investors have risk profiles. The risk profile of an investor tries to describe or
                   quantify the level of risk that the investor can absorb if things go wrong. The risk profile (or
                   risk rating) of a fund is usually based on the historical volatility of the fund and/or the assets
          it holds. Risk profile terminology is often used interchangeably: both low risk investors and funds can
          be referred to as “conservative”, for example. The meaning is consistent: the conservative investor is
          risk-averse; the conservative fund offers a low risk vehicle. Similarly an aggressive investor is risk-prone
          and an aggressive fund has a high risk/high return profile.
         should  become  more  heavily  weighted  in  bonds  and  cash.  Although  these  questionnaires  are
         useful, they do not generally go far enough.
           Other issues that need to be considered are:
           R   Investors  might  also  find  it  useful  to  ask  not  only  what  market  risk  they  can  tolerate,
              but also what market risk they cannot tolerate (eg, identify savings you can’t afford to be selling
              at a loss).
           R   Risk profile questionnaires, usually assume that all investment goals are long-term. However,
              this is sometimes not the case. People have different goals during their lives with different
              investment terms. This means that no one can have one savings plan based on the single
              assumption  of  risk  level.  Investments  have  to  be  structured  to  meet  various  targets  with
              different risk assessments for each goal.
           R   The relative income of an investor should be considered. An investor with more disposable
              income is able to take a higher risk.
           R   An investor with alternative liquid assets is able to take on a higher investment risk: in the case
              of an emergency, it is unlikely that he or she would have to sell his or her investments.
           R   Some investors may be advised to perform this investment exercise in reverse. Instead of
              starting with the question “What level of risk do I feel comfortable with?” the investor might
              ask, “What level of risk is it necessary to achieve to meet a predetermined investment goal?”
              Then it can be decided if that risk threshold can be tolerated.
           These considerations make it clear that risk assessment goes beyond a simple questionnaire.
         In designing investment strategies, the investor and financial adviser must work with four parameters:
         financial circumstances, financial needs, risk capacity and risk appetite. The interaction between
         these four often conflicting factors is surprisingly complex.
           How much weight should be given to risk appetite is a matter of some debate. Some commentators
         argue that financial needs and risk capacity are all important; others argue that understanding risk
         appetite is vital.
           The  problem  with  ignoring  risk  appetite  is  that  perceptions  lead  to  actions.  For  example,  a
         risk-averse  individual  placed  in  a  high-risk  product  (because  it  is  appropriate  to  financial  needs
         and  risk  capacity)  may,  out  of  fear,  offload  underperforming  investments  at  the  worst  possible
         time.  A  certain  composure  in  the  face  of  volatility  cannot  be  disregarded  –  it  is  a  necessary
         characteristic for investors who embrace the high end of the risk spectrum, whatever their “objective”
         risk capacity.
           For many years since the implementation of the FAIS Act, there have been debates about the
         definitions of “risk,” “risk profile” and “risk profiling.”
           For financial advisers, risk profiling is not optional – the General Code of Conduct (GCOC) requires
         intermediaries to consider the suitability of a product by taking into account the client’s needs and
         objectives, financial situation, risk profile and financial product knowledge and experience. It further
         states that advisers must consider the client’s ability to financially bear any costs or risks associated
         with  the  financial  product  and  the  extent  to  which  the  client  has  the  necessary  experience  and
         knowledge in order to understand the risks involved in the transaction.
           The code goes on to state that advisers must conduct an analysis, for purposes of the advice,
         based  on  the  information  obtained  and  identify  the  financial  product  or  products  that  will  be


       98                 Profile’s Unit Trusts & Collective Investments March 2026
   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105