Page 51 - Profile's Unit Trusts & Collective Investments - September 2025
P. 51

Basic concepts                                                        Chapter 2

         charge or a smaller ongoing trailer fee. (Note this would be in addition to the platform administration
         fees and underlying fund fees.)
           Where funds do still impose initial fees they range from 0% to 3.45% (on specialist equity funds).
         Even where these fees are imposed, unit trusts compare favourably to other “institutionalised” saving
         options. Although 3.45% is up to three or four times the cost of buying shares through a stockbroker,
         it is less than half the entry costs of products like endowment policies and life assurance, where total
         entry costs are often as much as 7%.
           Another advantage of unit trusts is that charges are fully disclosed. This level of transparency has
         not existed historically in the life assurance industry, and it was common for a buyer of an endowment
         policy  not  to  know  exactly  how  much  of  the  amounts  invested  are  actually  being  invested,  and
         how much is going towards costs. The publication of the effective annual costs (EAC) by most life
         insurance companies has improved cost disclosure.
         Convenience and liquidity
           Collective investments are easy to buy and easy to sell. Investors have the choice of buying unit
         trusts through an investment platform, through a financial adviser, through a bank, or directly from
         the unit trust management company. Debit orders can be cancelled, increased or decreased without
         penalty, unlike traditional assurance products. It is easy for investors to change their asset allocation
         as their personal circumstances change – they can switch from equity-based investments to fixed
         interest investments as required – and several services make it easy to manage a small portfolio
         of unit trusts. Most importantly, managers or management companies are obliged to repurchase
         participatory interests on demand, making collective investments highly liquid.
           This flexibility and transactive ease has a dark side, however. It can lead to a lack of investment
         discipline, and may allow investors to react emotionally to volatile market conditions: selling when
         the market is falling, and buying when stocks are making new highs. Emotional reactions often
         result in buying high, selling low – a sure way to lose money. This behaviour, in turn, can drive fund
         managers into “forced trade” situations, where they have to buy into an expensive market because
         of large inflows, only to sell into a weak market because of large outflows (ie, investors redeeming
         units).  So,  while  convenience  must  be  seen  as  an  advantage  of  unit  trusts,  it  does  demand  of
         investors that they become more knowledgeable and disciplined in their investment approach.
         Pros and cons of collective investment schemes
           The relative advantages and disadvantages of collective investment schemes is best illustrated
         by comparing CISs to other methods of investing in securities.
           As described above, the main advantages of CISs include transparency, freely available price and
         performance data, a high level of regulation, professional management, and guaranteed buy-back
         of participatory interests.
         Direct investment
           If you have enough capital, acquiring a share portfolio directly through a stockbroker is the most
         obvious alternative to equity unit trusts. As a private investor, you need skill, time, and a cool head
         to invest successfully in the stock market. Private investors have greater investment flexibility and
         many may well outperform fund managers over time. Research suggests, however, that the majority
         of  retail  investors  with  stockbroking  accounts  would  be  better  off  using  unit  trusts  or  exchange
         traded funds (ETFs).
           In 2013 two University of California finance professors published research showing how individual
         investors earn poor returns from direct investments in the stock market (even before costs). Their
         work has been confirmed in subsequent research that shows retail investors are poor stock pickers
         who trade too often (driving up costs and impairing returns). The professors’ 2013 study states that
         “many individual investors seem to have a desire to trade actively coupled with perverse security
         selection ability”.
           The advantages of direct investment include lower costs and more investment flexibility. The main
         disadvantages are the high level of expertise required, the considerable amount of time required to




                      Profile’s Unit Trusts & Collective Investments September 2025    49
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56