Page 77 - Profile's Unit Trusts & Collective Investments - March 2026
P. 77

The CIS industry                                                      Chapter 4


          What is a LISP?
          A linked investment service provider (LISP), also known as an investment platform, is a financial
          institution which packages, distributes and administers a broad range of unit trust-based
          investments spanning voluntary to retirement planning products. Any investment made
          through these platforms provides a client a single entry into a selection of investments which can,
          with the help of a financial adviser, be used to create a suitable portfolio. Note that LISPA (the industry
          association for LISPs) merged with the ACI, the LOA and IMASA to form ASISA in 2008.
         behalf of clients in units in a collective investment scheme on the basis that such units are purchased
         and held in bulk or repurchased in bulk”.
           LISPs  have  been  described  as  “unit  trust  warehouses”  or  “fund  supermarkets”.  They  play  a
         significant role in the industry, and have at times been responsible for up to half of all inflows into unit
         trusts and over a third of all assets under management.
           A LISP can be registered as a discretionary or non-discretionary service provider. A discretionary
         service  provider  makes  and  implements  investment  decisions  on  behalf  of  clients,  whereas  a
         non-discretionary  service  provider  provides  facilities  for  buying,  managing  and  switching
         investments but does not get involved in decision making.
           Most of the bigger, more successful linked product companies are associated with banks or life
         insurance companies and use the bank’s client base to sell their products. LISPs offer two main
         advantages to investors. The first is the ability to buy units across a wide range of management
         companies through one service provider. The second is the ability to switch cheaply from one fund
         to another across the industry (ie, not just within one management company).
           LISPs have been largely responsible for the narrowing of the gap between wholesale products and
         retail products. In the late 1990s, retail investors paid initial charges of 5% while wholesale rates (to
         institutional clients) were a fraction of a percent. By negotiating wholesale rates and passing these
         on to the retail market, LISPs changed investors’ perceptions of what they should pay in charges.
         Competition amongst LISPs has been an important factor in a broad industry to move away from
         initial fees. LISP online platforms have also contributed to downward pressure on annual fees.
           If this is a positive influence of the LISP movement, one negative has been the increased churning
         in the industry. The term “churning” derives from the 1980s bull run when certain US brokerage firms
         were guilty of buying and selling shares aggressively for clients, mainly to earn brokerage fees, and
         with little concern for investment performance.
           Churning  appears  to  have  been  less  of  a  problem  in
         recent  years,  although  some  commentators  are  still
         concerned that unit trust portfolios in the hands of investors
         are  generally  adjusted  too  frequently.  Switching  on  the
         Momentum investment platform or LISP in 2021 resulted
         in  an  annualised  behaviour  tax  of  3.5%  for  investors
         amounting to more than R90m, the company has reported.
         Retirement products
           LISPs have also largely been responsible for enabling the
         development of retirement funds and living annuities that
         offer  members  or  annuitants  a  choice  of  underlying  unit
         trust investments.
           For  individuals,  most  LISPs  offer  retirement  annuities
         (RAs),  investment-linked  living  annuities  (ILLAs)  or
         preservation funds with a choice of underlying unit trusts.
         In the case of RAs and preservation funds, the unit trusts
         need  to  be  those  that  comply  with  Regulation  28  of  the
         Pension Funds Act or the choice of funds in the product
         must comply with Regulation 28. The only exceptions are



                        Profile’s Unit Trusts & Collective Investments March 2026      75
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82