Page 94 - Profile's Unit Trusts & Collective Investments - September 2025
P. 94

Chapter 5                                             Legislation and guidelines

         consumer groupings, there do not seem to be any already understood terms that could readily be
         used to clearly distinguish between the PSA and RFA adviser categories. Instead, it is clear that
         whatever  designations  are  finally  adopted  will  require  a  wide-ranging  consumer  awareness  and
         education campaign”.
           The  FSCA’s  latest  proposals  are  that  a  PSA  (including  a  juristic  PSA)  should  be  limited  to
         providing both advice and non-advice intermediary services in respect of its “home financial group’s
         products only.”
           The FSCA’s December 2019 update also clarified its position on attempts to more clearly delineate
         intermediation activities, outsourced services and advice. The FSCA is considering several possible
         legislative proposals, including:
           R   rules to facilitate the charging of advice fees separate from commissions in order to achieve a
              clear demarcation of advice and “services as intermediary”;
           R   an  approval  process  to  replace  the  current  outsourcing  notification  process,  plus  further
              reporting requirements in respect of outsourcing.
           These are preliminary proposals that are still to be tested on consumers.
           Another RDR proposal with far-reaching consequences seeks to stop agents earning recurring
         fees unless the financial adviser is providing recurring advice. Currently many financial advisers
         earn commission on recurring monthly payments (such as debit orders) even if they do not see
         clients regularly to review their portfolios, needs and risk profiles.
         FAIS Ombud
           The  FAIS  Act  sets  up  the  Ombud  for  Financial  Service  Providers  or  FAIS  Ombud,  charged
         with adjudicating complaints. In terms of the Act, the objective of the Ombud is to “consider and
         dispose of complaints in a procedurally fair, informal, economical and expeditious manner”. The
         office of the Ombud provides a dispute resolution mechanism which avoids lengthy and costly court
         proceedings. In considering complaints, the Ombud must consider the contractual arrangements
         and legal relationship between the parties, and must act in a fair, impartial and independent manner.
           A determination made by the Ombud (or a final decision by a board of appeal) is regarded as a civil
         judgement of court.
           The Ombud has fairly broad powers in terms of the FAIS Act. He may elect to refer a matter to
         court if he feels that there are reasonable grounds why the office of the Ombud should not deal with
         the matter. Most disputes between consumers and FSPs or FSPRs, however, will be considered by
         the Ombud. Note that the Ombud may not consider a matter which has already been taken to court.
           Before beginning an official investigation into a complaint, the Ombud must in writing inform every
         other interested party about the complaint, and must give all parties an opportunity to submit a
         response to the complaint.
           The Ombud must, as a first resort, “explore any reasonable prospect of resolving a complaint by a
         conciliated settlement acceptable to all parties”. The Ombud may suggest mediation to the parties,
         and may allow legal representation if he feels this is appropriate.
           Where possible, the Ombud will suggest a solution to the parties. The parties must advise the
         Ombud whether his recommendation is acceptable, and must give reasons if it is not acceptable.
         Where the parties accept the Ombud’s recommendations, it has the force of a court order.
           If  the  Ombud  is  unable  to  achieve  some  conciliation  between  the  parties,  the  Ombud
         must  make  a  final  determination.  This  could  involve  dismissing  the  complaint,  upholding  the
         complaint,  or  partially  upholding  the  complaint.  In  the  latter  cases,  the  Ombud  may  make  a
         monetary award as compensation for damages suffered, provided this does not exceed the limit on
         awards. This amount was set in the rules on proceedings under the FAIS Act in 2003 at R800 000.
         In  July  2024  this  amount  was  increased  for  the  first  time  in  two  decades  to  R3.5m  when  the
         Ombud Council Rules for the Ombud for Financial Services (FAIS Ombud) were published in terms
         of FSR Act. The Ombud may also order the FSP or representative to take specific action in relation
         to a complaint.




       92                Profile’s Unit Trusts & Collective Investments September 2025
   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99